# FinBERT and BloombergGPT

Domain-specific financial language models, trained or adapted on financial text where general models mishandle the vocabulary.

**Rests on:** Continued Pre-Training, Pre-Trained Model Adaptation

*Applied Domains · AI in Finance*


## Why learn this

This concept explains why general-purpose language models often stumble over financial news—misinterpreting positive corporate updates as negative warnings—and how specialists fixed this gap. Understanding these tools reveals the value of domain-specific AI: a system trained exclusively on the vocabulary of one field to capture its precise meanings. This insight is practical because it shows how accuracy in finance relies on context, not just grammar. You will see how training a model on specific texts like earnings reports improves its ability to distinguish between risk and opportunity. It also introduces the real-world constraints of building financial AI, such as the need for high-quality data and the importance of tracing an AI's conclusion back to specific evidence in a document.


## The intuition

Imagine you are fluent in English but start a new job in finance. You hear the phrase 'volatility is high.' In everyday life, volatility suggests instability or danger. But a trader hears 'high volatility' and thinks of big price swings—which could mean big profits or big losses. The same words carry different weights. A general language model, trained on novels, Wikipedia, and general web text, learned that 'volatile' often appears next to 'unstable' or 'dangerous.' It assumes the worst. In finance, however, 'volatile' is a neutral descriptor of market movement. If the text says 'the stock was volatile,' the model might wrongly label it as negative sentiment, when for a trader, it might be a signal of opportunity.

Models like FinBERT and BloombergGPT solve this by being trained specifically on financial texts: earnings reports, regulatory filings, and business news. They have read thousands of sentences containing phrases like 'earnings beat,' 'guidance cut,' or 'liquidity crunch.' They learn that in finance, these are technical terms with specific emotional weights. For example, they learn that 'the company beat earnings' is good news, not a reference to a sports game. They understand that 'margin pressure' refers to profit margins shrinking, not physical compression. Because they have seen these patterns repeatedly in the correct context, they do not mislabel neutral financial statements as negative warnings. They act like specialists who know the jargon of their trade inside out.


## An analogy

Think of a doctor. A general practitioner can diagnose a cold or a flu, but when it comes to interpreting a heart monitor reading, a cardiologist is far superior. The cardiologist has spent years studying specific waveforms that indicate heart health or danger. Similarly, FinBERT is like a cardiologist for text: it has spent its training hours analyzing annual reports and stock analyst notes. A general model might read 'the company faces margin pressure' and wonder about physical squeezing. But FinBERT, having seen this phrase linked to profit declines thousands of times, instantly recognizes it as a financial warning. The analogy holds because both specialists outperform generalists in their narrow domain due to focused exposure. However, unlike a human doctor who understands the biology behind the diagnosis, this AI model does not 'understand' money; it simply recognizes that certain word patterns statistically predict specific outcomes.


## Definition

FinBERT and BloombergGPT are large language models trained on vast amounts of financial text—such as news articles, earnings reports, and regulatory filings—so they understand the specific meanings and emotional tones of financial terminology better than general-purpose models.


## How it connects

This concept links to 'Large Language Models,' which you may know as the technology behind chatbots that generate human-like text. FinBERT is a specialized version of this technology, adapted for finance rather than general conversation. It connects to 'Financial Sentiment Analysis,' which is the process of determining whether a piece of text expresses a positive, negative, or neutral opinion about a company or market condition. By using these models, you can automate the reading of thousands of news articles to gauge market mood.


## The mathematics

This concept does not require you to do any mathematical calculations, but it helps to understand one idea: how a model 'learns' the meaning of words. A language model represents each word as a list of numbers — a vector. Think of a vector as a point in a high-dimensional space. Words that appear in similar contexts get points that are close together. For example, in general text, 'good' and 'great' are close because they are used similarly. But in financial text, 'volatile' and 'stable' might be far apart because they describe different market conditions. Training a model like FinBERT involves adjusting these points so that words that appear together in financial sentences become closer. This is done by a process called gradient descent, which you will learn later — but for now, know that the model changes the numbers in the vectors based on errors it makes predicting words. The mathematics behind this is linear algebra — specifically, vectors and dot products. A dot product measures how aligned two vectors are. When a model predicts the next word, it computes a dot product between the current context vector and each candidate word's vector; higher dot product means more likely. You do not need to compute these by hand — the model does it billions of times. But the key is: the vectors for financial terms are different from what a general model learned. FinBERT's vectors are tuned to financial co-occurrences, so its dot products reflect financial meaning.

For each word w, the model has a vector v_w. For a context c, the score for w is the dot product: score = v_w · c = Σᵢ v_w[i] × c[i]. The model picks the word with the highest score. The vectors are learned during training, so FinBERT's vectors differ from a general model's.


## A worked example

```
Imagine we have a tiny model that represents two words: 'volatile' and 'stable'. In a general model, they might be represented as vectors: volatile = [0.5, 0.2, -0.1], stable = [0.4, 0.3, 0.0]. In a financial model, they might be: volatile = [0.9, -0.4, 0.2], stable = [0.1, 0.8, -0.3]. We will compute the dot product of each with a context vector representing 'market conditions' = [1.0, 0.5, 0.0].

Step 1: General model dot product: volatile · context = (0.5×1.0) + (0.2×0.5) + (-0.1×0.0) = 0.5 + 0.1 + 0 = 0.6   # This is the general model's alignment score for 'volatile' given the context.
Step 2: General model dot product: stable · context = (0.4×1.0) + (0.3×0.5) + (0.0×0.0) = 0.4 + 0.15 + 0 = 0.55   # The general model scores 'stable' slightly lower than 'volatile'.
Step 3: Financial model dot product: volatile · context = (0.9×1.0) + (-0.4×0.5) + (0.2×0.0) = 0.9 - 0.2 + 0 = 0.7   # In the financial model, 'volatile' scores higher — it is more aligned with 'market conditions'.
Step 4: Financial model dot product: stable · context = (0.1×1.0) + (0.8×0.5) + (-0.3×0.0) = 0.1 + 0.4 + 0 = 0.5   # The financial model scores 'stable' lower than 'volatile', reflecting financial usage.

Result: The financial model ranks 'volatile' above 'stable' for this context, while the general model is almost indifferent. This illustrates why FinBERT is better at financial tasks.
```


## From scratch, in Python

```python
import math

def dot_product(vec1, vec2):
    """Multiply pairs and add them up."""
    total = 0
    for i in range(len(vec1)):
        total = total + vec1[i] * vec2[i]
    return total

# Two models' vectors for the word 'volatile'
general_volatile = [0.5, 0.2, -0.1]
finbert_volatile = [0.9, -0.4, 0.2]

# Context: 'market conditions'
context = [1.0, 0.5, 0.0]

score_general = dot_product(general_volatile, context)
score_finbert = dot_product(finbert_volatile, context)

print('General model score:', score_general)
print('FinBERT score:', score_finbert)
```


## The same thing, with a framework

```python
In practice, you would use a library like Hugging Face's `transformers` to load FinBERT. For example, `from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel` and then `tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("ProsusAI/finbert")`, `model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("ProsusAI/finbert")`. The tokenizer converts words to numbers (tokens), and the model converts those to vectors. Underneath, it is doing the same dot-product operations, but efficiently on GPUs.
```


## What the code does

This code shows how a dot product is calculated for two vectors. The function `dot_product` takes two lists (lists of numbers) and multiplies each pair, adding them up. We first define two vectors representing the word 'volatile' — one from a general model, one from FinBERT. Then we define a context vector for 'market conditions'. Finally we compute the scores: `dot_product(general_volatile, context)` gives 0.6, and `dot_product(finbert_volatile, context)` gives 0.7. The higher score in the financial model means 'volatile' is more associated with 'market conditions' — a sign that FinBERT has learned financial usage. This is the same arithmetic a real model does billions of times, but with much longer vectors.


## Common misconceptions

**FinBERT understands finance like a human analyst** — FinBERT can read an earnings report and understand what it means, like a financial expert.

FinBERT is a statistical pattern matcher. It has no conceptual understanding. It has seen many examples of 'profit' and 'loss' in financial text, so it can predict that 'profit' often follows 'increase,' but it does not know what profit actually is. In fact: FinBERT learns word associations and sentiment patterns from financial text. It can classify sentiment or extract entities, but it has no reasoning ability.

**Bigger is always better** — A larger model like BloombergGPT is always better than a smaller one like FinBERT for any financial task.

BloombergGPT is better at some tasks (like answering questions) but requires far more compute and data. For simple sentiment classification, a smaller model like FinBERT is faster, cheaper, and can run on a laptop. In fact: Model size is a trade-off. Choose the smallest model that meets your accuracy needs, considering deployment constraints.

**FinBERT is the only financial model** — FinBERT and BloombergGPT are the only options for financial language models.

There are many others, like FinGPT and more recent models. FinBERT was released in 2019; newer models may be better. In fact: FinBERT is a commonly used open-source model, but the landscape evolves. Always check for newer alternatives.

**Training on financial text fixes everything** — Once a model is trained on financial text, it will never make mistakes in finance.

It will still struggle with numerical reasoning, ambiguous statements, and sarcasm. It may also have biases from its training data. In fact: Domain training improves performance on specific tasks but does not make the model perfect. Always validate with point-in-time data and add controls.

**Open-source means free to use for anything** — Because FinBERT is open-source, I can use it for any commercial purpose without restriction.

Open-source licenses vary. FinBERT's license may allow commercial use, but it does not grant rights to the data it was trained on. Also, BloombergGPT is proprietary. In fact: Check the model's license and the terms of any data used. Data licensing is a barrier — your library notes that it is as much a barrier as compute.


## In short

FinBERT and BloombergGPT are examples of domain-specific language models: they are trained on financial text so they understand financial vocabulary and sentiment conventions better than general models. FinBERT is a small open-source model good for sentiment analysis on a laptop; BloombergGPT is a large proprietary model used inside Bloomberg. The key lesson: choosing the right model means matching it to your task, your data, and your deployment constraints, and always adding controls for compliance and accuracy.


## Where this is used

FinBERT and BloombergGPT are used in several concrete ways in building AI systems.

**In large language models (LLMs):** FinBERT is itself a smaller LLM (110 million parameters, compared to GPT-3's 175 billion). But its architecture is the same—a transformer. Developers use it as a base for fine-tuning on specific financial tasks, like sentiment analysis of news headlines. BloombergGPT is a much larger model (50 billion parameters) trained from scratch on a mix of general and financial text. It is used inside Bloomberg's terminal for tasks like question answering about financial data. The point is not that you must use these exact models, but that domain-specific pretraining makes a difference: the model's weights encode financial knowledge.

**In small models running on devices (TinyML):** FinBERT is small enough to run on a laptop or even a mobile phone with optimization. For example, a trading app might use a distilled version of FinBERT to classify sentiment of push notifications on-the-fly, without sending data to a server. This matters for latency (real-time decisions) and privacy (keeping user data local). General models like GPT-4 are too large for this; they need cloud servers.

**In retrieval-augmented generation (RAG):** When you ask a chatbot about a company's earnings, the system retrieves relevant documents (like the earnings call transcript) and feeds them to the model. FinBERT can be used to embed those documents into vectors so that retrieval works. The embedding is the output of the model's last hidden layer. Because FinBERT understands financial language, the embeddings place 'margin expansion' near other profit-related phrases, making retrieval more accurate. A developer writes a function to encode a query and documents, then computes cosine similarity (another dot product) to find the best matches.

**In agentic systems:** An agent that plans and calls tools (like a financial analyst assistant) might use FinBERT to first classify whether a user query is about sentiment or about numbers. If sentiment, it runs FinBERT; if numbers, it calls an arithmetic tool (as your library notes: tool use for arithmetic beats asking the model to compute). This combines the strength of domain-specific models with programmatic computation.

**In everyday applied machine learning:** FinBERT is commonly used for financial sentiment classification (positive/negative/neutral). A hedge fund might feed it Reuters headlines to gauge market mood. A bank might use it to scan loan application notes for risk signals. A compliance officer might use it to flag deceptive language in filings. In each case, the model outputs a probability — the developer sets a threshold (e.g., >0.8 for 'positive') to decide. The critical controls: always test on point-in-time data (your library's rule) and make sure answers trace to evidence spans (because regulators require it). BloombergGPT, being larger, is used for question answering and summarization of financial news within the Bloomberg terminal — a developer might query it via an API.

**What breaks when done badly:** If you use a general sentiment model on financial text, you will get wrong labels — calling 'volatile' negative. If you train FinBERT on outdated data, it will misclassify new terms. If you ignore data licensing, you may violate terms of service — BloombergGPT is built on Bloomberg's proprietary data, which is why it is not open-source. If you use FinBERT for numerical reasoning, it will fail — it does not know arithmetic. So the rule: pick the right tool for the task, and respect the data and controls.


---

Read this on the web: https://basavapurushottam.com/learn-ai/finbert-and-bloomberggpt
