# Trace-First Development

Instrumenting before optimising, so every iteration is guided by observed behaviour rather than assumption.

**Rests on:** Prompt Iteration

*MLOps and Platform · MLOps*


## Why learn this

This concept turns debugging AI systems from guessing into reading. When you build AI programs that generate text, answer questions, or use outside tools, they will make mistakes — the answer is wrong, it missed important information, or it called the wrong tool. Without a trace log, you stare at the final output and guess what happened inside. With a trace log, you see the whole journey: exactly what question was asked, what data was found, which actions were taken, what results came back, and where the system hesitated or made poor choices. This is the most important step in building reliable AI systems. It unlocks the ability to use tools like MLflow Tracing (a specific software feature for recording these steps) and Drift Detection (noticeing when your data changes unexpectedly). It also supports a practice called 'instrument first', which means setting up these recordings before you try to make the system fast or perfect. It separates a rough demo from a dependable product.


## The intuition

Imagine you are cooking a complicated new dish. You follow a recipe, but the result tastes wrong. You could guess which ingredient was off — too much salt? Overcooked? Wrong spice? — and change it for the next try. But if you wrote down every step as you cooked — the exact amounts, the time on the heat, the order you added things — you could look back and see exactly where it went wrong. That written record is a trace. Trace-first development means you build that record before you start cooking, not after. The same principle applies to AI systems. A generative AI model is like a chef: you give it a prompt (the recipe), it does many internal steps (thinking, retrieving data, calling tools, formatting the answer), and it produces an output. If you don't record each step, you cannot know why it produced what it did. Trace-first means every time you run the system, you automatically save a trace: what the system saw, what it did, what it returned. Then, when something fails, you read the trace instead of guessing. This is especially powerful because AI systems are unpredictable. A simple computer program always does the same thing with the same input; you can debug it by reading its code lines. But generative AI is probabilistic — this means the system's output varies randomly even with identical inputs. The same prompt can give different answers each time. You cannot just read the static code to know what it did in a specific instance. The only reliable way is to have watched that specific instance, and the only way to watch it is to have recorded it. The core insight is simple: observation beats assumption. You might assume the model 'knew' something or 'missed' a context, but until you see the actual prompt and what it retrieved, you're just guessing. Trace-first makes every iteration — every change you make — based on facts, not faith.


## An analogy

Think of a detective solving a crime. The detective's job is to figure out what happened. If she only sees the final scene — a broken window, a missing wallet — she has to guess. But if the house has a security camera that recorded the whole night, she can watch: who came, what they touched, where they went. The camera footage is a trace. The detective's reports are also traces: every interview, every note, every clue is recorded so she can go back and re-examine her assumptions. Trace-first development is the rule: turn on the camera before the crime happens, take notes before you forget. In AI, you don't have a crime, you have a system that is working or failing. A trace is what the system saw and did. It is the security footage of the model's mind. Just as a detective uses evidence to form a hypothesis, you use traces to form a hypothesis about why the system failed. And just as a detective would never rely on a memory of what happened, you should never rely on your memory of what the model did — because generative AI can surprise you. The analogy breaks down a little: a detective's camera is passive, it doesn't change what happens. But in AI, the act of tracing can slow the system down, or change what it records. That is why trace-first says: instrument before you optimize. You add the recording first, then you make the system faster. If you optimise first, you might remove the very thing you need to watch. So the detective rule is: set up the cameras, then solve the crime.


## Definition

Trace-first development is the practice of adding instrumentation (recording tools) to an AI system before optimizing its performance or debugging its errors, so that every improvement is guided by a observed record of what the system actually did, rather than by assumption about what it did.


## How it connects

You're starting fresh, so this is your first MLOps concept. MLOps is the discipline of getting machine learning to work reliably in production: versioning data and code, automating training, monitoring behaviour, and feeding what you learn back. Trace-first is the foundation stone of that discipline because you can't version, monitor, or feed back reliably without knowing what happened. It connects to: Model Serving APIs — these are the interfaces that allow other software to ask your model for answers; traces usually start here, recording every request coming in. MLflow Tracing — this is a systematic tool that implements this idea; a trace in technical terms is the recorded path of a single request through the system. Drift Detection — this watches whether the distribution of inputs or outputs changes over time; it only works if you have a baseline of traces to compare against. Human-in-the-Loop Feedback — where a human reviews model outputs for quality; traces give that human the evidence to make a judgement. Canary Releases — where you release a new version of the model to a small slice of users to test it; traces tell you whether the new version is behaving differently. Model Registry — this is a central library where different versions of your trained models are stored and managed; traces reference which model version produced them, so you can connect a failure to a specific model release.


## From scratch, in Python

```python
# What is a trace, in code?

# Imagine a simple AI system: a function that takes a question and returns an answer.
# Without tracing, this is all you see:

def answer_question(question):
    # pretend this calls a big language model
    return "The capital of France is Paris."

# With tracing, you write down what happened step by step.

# Before tracing, we need to learn a few Python basics.
# A list stores items in order, e.g. ["start", "retrieved: Paris page", "called tool: capital_of"].
trace = []  # an empty list, ready to record steps

# A dictionary stores key-value pairs, looking up by name, e.g. {"step": 1, "action": "call model"}.
# This is perfect for one trace entry.

# A function is a named block of code you can call. We defined one above.

# Let's write a traced version:

def answered_with_trace(question):
    # record every step in the trace list
    trace.append({"step": 1, "action": "receive question", "value": question})
    
    # pretend retrieval: find relevant docs
    retrieved = "Paris page"  # in real life, this is a list of documents
    trace.append({"step": 2, "action": "retrieve", "value": retrieved})
    
    # pretend call to a language model
    prompt = f"Answer the question based on: {retrieved}"
    trace.append({"step": 3, "action": "build prompt", "value": prompt})
    
    # pretend model call (this would be a real API call)
    model_output = "The capital of France is Paris."
    trace.append({"step": 4, "action": "call model", "value": model_output})
    
    # return just the answer, but the trace is recorded
    return model_output

# You use the same function, but now you have a trace:
answer = answered_with_trace("What is the capital of France?")
print("Answer:", answer)
print("Trace:")
for entry in trace:
    print(entry)

# This prints:
# Answer: The capital of France is Paris.
# Trace:
# {'step': 1, 'action': 'receive question', 'value': 'What is the capital of France?'}
# {'step': 2, 'action': 'retrieve', 'value': 'Paris page'}
# {'step': 3, 'action': 'build prompt', 'value': 'Answer the question based on: Paris page'}
# {'step': 4, 'action': 'call model', 'value': 'The capital of France is Paris.'}

# Now imagine the answer is wrong. Without the trace, you only see the wrong answer.
# With the trace, you can look at each step and see where it went wrong.
# Maybe the retrieval step returned the wrong page, or the prompt was badly built.
# That is the essence of trace-first.

```


## What the code does

The code shows a simple function that answers a question. It uses a list, a dictionary, and a function. The list `trace` holds every step as a dictionary. Each dictionary records what happened at that step: the step number, the action, and the value. The `answered_with_trace` function first appends the question, then simulates a retrieval, then builds a prompt, then simulates a model call, appending each to the trace. After calling the function, the trace is printed. Even though the function returns just the answer, the trace is stored in the `trace` list, which you can inspect. This is the minimal version of tracing: append entries to a list. In real systems, you would write the trace to a log file or a tracing system, and each trace would have an ID tying it to a single request. But the principle is identical: record each step so you can inspect it later.


## Common misconceptions

**Tracing is only for debugging errors** — I only need to add tracing when something goes wrong.

If you add tracing after a failure, it's too late to capture what happened before the failure. You need a baseline of traces from the beginning to know what normal behaviour looks like, and to have the data to compare against when something breaks. In fact: Tracing is a continuous practice that starts before the first deployment. It gives you a baseline of normal behaviour, and that baseline is what makes debugging possible later.

**Tracing slows down the system too much** — Adding tracing will make my model slower, so I'll skip it.

Tracing does add some overhead, but you can design it to be minimal. In many cases, the overhead is worth the visibility. You can also sample traces — record only a fraction of requests — to reduce overhead while still getting insights. In fact: Tracing adds some latency, but you can mitigate it by sampling and by designing efficient trace collection. The cost of being blind to failures is usually far higher than the cost of tracing.

**Tracing is the same as logging an error message** — I already log errors with a print statement, so I'm already tracing.

Error logs only show when something failed. A trace records the entire flow — the inputs, the intermediate steps, the outputs — for both successes and failures. It gives you the full context, not just the failure point. In fact: A trace is a detailed record of an entire request's journey through the system, including all its steps. It's more like a video recording, whereas an error log is just the alarm bell.

**I can trust what the model says; I don't need to see why** — The model gave the right answer, so I don't need to know how it got there.

The output might be right for the wrong reason. For example, the model might have retrieved the wrong document but happened to produce a correct answer. If you don't trace, you won't know that the retrieval is faulty, and it will fail on a different question. In fact: You need traces not just for failures, but also for successes, to verify that the system is doing the right thing for the right reasons.

**Tracing is only for generative AI** — I work on non-generative models, so tracing doesn't apply to me.

Tracing is valuable for any complex system, including traditional machine learning models. For example, in a fraud detection model, you need to trace the features and the model version to understand why a false positive occurred. In fact: Tracing is a general MLOps practice that applies to all models, not just generative ones. Any system with multiple steps and non-deterministic behaviour benefits from tracing.

**Trace-first means you don't plan ahead** — Trace-first means I just code and see what happens.

Trace-first is not about skipping planning. It's about making your plans guided by evidence. You still design the system, but you ensure that you can observe what happens at each step, so that when you iterate, you have data to guide you. In fact: Trace-first means you plan your instrumentation as carefully as you plan your features. You decide what to record, where, and how, before you start building.


## In short

Trace-first development means adding instrumentation to your AI system before you optimise or debug it. Every request produces a trace — a record of what the system saw, did, and returned. This trace becomes your source of truth, turning debugging from guessing into reading. The key rule: instrument before you optimise, because the cases you lose are the ones you didn't instrument for. This is the foundation of MLOps and the prerequisite for tools like MLflow Tracing, drift detection, and effective production monitoring.


## Where this is used

Trace-first development is a pervasive practice in building AI systems, especially generative ones. In large language model applications, every request to the model — the prompt, the model's output, the tokens used, the time taken — is recorded as a trace. This allows developers to debug why a response was wrong: they can see the exact prompt that was sent, whether retrieval returned the right documents, and what the model generated. Without tracing, a wrong answer is a mystery. With tracing, it is a detective's case file. In small language models running on a phone or laptop, tracing is even more important because resources are constrained. If the model runs out of memory or is slow, a trace can show where the bottleneck is. The developer can see the sequence of operations — tokenisation, inference, post-processing — and identify the slow step. This is the 'instrument before optimise' rule in action: you don't optimise the model to be faster until you know which step is slow. In retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), which powers many question-answering systems, a trace records the user's question, the search query generated from it, the documents retrieved, their scores, and how they were combined into the prompt. If the system gives a poor answer, you can look at the retrieval step and see whether the right document was found. You can adjust the search parameters — such as the number of documents or a threshold — based on what you observed, not on guesswork. In agentic systems that plan and call tools, traces are indispensable. An agent might reason through a problem, decide to call a weather API, interpret the result, and then act. A trace records every step of this chain: the agent's thoughts, the tool it chose, the arguments it passed, the result it received, and its final decision. If the agent gets something wrong — like calling a calculator with the wrong arguments — you can see exactly where it went wrong. Debugging without a trace is impossible because the agent's reasoning is not deterministic; with a trace, you can replay its decision path. In everyday applied machine learning, traces are used for data pipelines, model training, and prediction serving. For example, when a fraud detection model scores a transaction, a trace can record the features used, the model version, and the prediction. If a false positive occurs, you can trace back to which feature triggered it. In recommendation systems, traces record user interactions and the recommendations shown, enabling you to understand why a certain item was recommended. In speech systems, traces record the audio input, the transcription, and the confidence scores, helping to debug transcription errors. What a developer actually writes: they add logging statements in the code that record key events — a request received, a database lookup, a call to an external API, a prediction made. Many modern frameworks include built-in tracing, such as MLflow's tracing for generative AI, but the principle is the same: you insert code that records what happens. The developer typically defines a trace object, adds spans to it (a span is a section of the trace — like 'retrieval' or 'model call'), and records metadata. When something goes wrong, they open the trace in a tracing UI and read it like a report. What breaks when it is done badly: if you add traces after the fact, you often discover you need data from a step you didn't record — the original prompt, the exact version of the model, the retrieval score. You cannot go back in time. This is the core message of trace-first: instrument before you optimise, because the cases you lose are exactly the ones you didn't instrument for. A system without traces might work for demos, but it will fail in production and you will be blind to why.


---

Read this on the web: https://basavapurushottam.com/learn-ai/trace-first-development
